I keep looking around online to see who's talking about Connect America and why. And what are they saying? Aside from gatherings in Duffield, Virginia and Austin, Texas on Thursday, where else are folks talking about Connect America?
Here are just a few examples, and then I ran some numbers, if for no other reason than my own curiosity's sake. From 2005 - 2012, did 69% of the nation's USDA Community Connect grants for FTTH go to far southwest Virginia?? (chart below)
February 5, 2014: "Members of the Rural Broadband Policy Group (“RBPG”) applaud the FCC’s decision to adopt the Rural Broadband Trials experiment. The experiment opens the door for providers committed to rural communities to access funding to connect the unserved and close the digital divide. Today’s announcement is a major victory for rural consumers and rural broadband deployment." http://ruralassembly.org/blog/2014/2/5/rural-groups-applaud-fcc-rural-broadband-trials-experiment
February 5, 2014: "The transition to IP networks, and the policy modernization that will accompany it, represent the largest telecom changes since the ’96 Act. It’s going to be an exciting several years." Rick Boucher http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/197573-rick-boucher-the-future-of-telecommunications#ixzz2yDQO6WH3
April 2, 2014: "... the Connect America Fund (CAF) – the largest broadband infrastructure program ever established." FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler blog entry at www.fcc.gov/blog/new-approaches-broadband-wireline-licensed-and-unlicensed
April 2, 2014: "... the Connect America Fund (CAF) – the largest broadband infrastructure program ever established." FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler blog entry at www.fcc.gov/blog/new-approaches-broadband-wireline-licensed-and-unlicensed
They totally lost me on that second sentence. "For the first time, cooperatives, municipalities, nonprofits, anchor institutions, and Tribal governments will be able to access federal funding to bring broadband service to rural areas." Really?? In contrast, it appears to me that a more correct sentence would be, "Since 2002, cooperatives, municipalities, nonprofits, anchor
institutions, and Tribal governments have
been accessing federal funding to bring broadband service to rural
areas."
"Major victory" sounds great. "Largest telecom changes since the ’96 Act" does sounds exciting. "Historic opportunity" sounds wonderful. "Largest broadband infrastructure program ever established" sounds huge. (Although I do understand that only a currently unknown portion, will be available through the upcoming competitive application process, Connect America Phase II.)
But I am certainly not convinced that "For the first time, cooperatives, municipalities, nonprofits, anchor institutions, and Tribal governments will be able to access federal funding to bring broadband service to rural areas," as stated by the Center for Rural Strategies.
I will admit, aside from the one-time ARRA BIP funds in 2010, from 2005 - 2012, most of the federal grants specifically for rural "last mile" Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH) connections, the USDA Community Connect program, went to far southwest Virginia. Until 2013, almost every other Community Connect grantee was providing broadband through Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC), DSL or wireless. It appears that far southwest Virginia was perhaps running "ahead of the game" in deploying rural FTTH through Community Connect grants during 2005-2012.
community | grant | population | "per person" | service | year |
Rose Hill VA "my grant" | $506,048 | 714 | $709 | FTTH | 2005 |
Ewing VA (CDP) "my grant" | $454,558 | 436 | $1,043 | FTTH | 2006 |
Saint Charles VA "my grant" | $594,400 | 159 | $3,738 | FTTH | 2007 |
Blackwater VA "my grant" | $759,600 | 90 | $8,440 | FTTH | 2008 |
Yuma VA "my neighbor's grant" | $999,207 | 100 | $9,992 | FTTH | 2008 |
Toms Creek VA "my neighbor's grant" | $1,500,000 | 100 | $15,000 | FTTH | 2012 |
Flat Top VA "my neighbor's grant" | $1,500,000 | 30 | $50,000 | FTTH | 2011 |
Saint Paul AK | $554,140 | 532 | $1,042 | FTTH | 2012 |
Tule River Indian Reservation CA | $795,630 | 566 | $1,406 | FTTH | 2005 |
Raymondville MO | $727,388 | 442 | $1,646 | FTTH | 2007 |
Oxford ID | $198,292 | 53 | $3,741 | FTTH | 2005 |
Darbyville OH | $603,200 | 40 | $15,080 | FTTH | 2007 |
Total | $9,192,463 |
Unless some other 2008 grantees were doing FTTH, which doesn't appear to be likely, then from 2005 - 2012, seven out of the twelve Community Connect grants for rural FTTH went to far southwest Virginia. Collectively, those 7 grant awards add up to 69% of the funds spent on FTTH projects.
Accordingly, from 2005 - 2012, about 69% of the total federal Community Connect grant funds for rural FTTH connections went to far southwest Virginia.